A prospective, randomized, controlled trial study of comparison of two techniques for laryngeal mask airway insertion

  • Dimple Wali Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College,
  • Anjali Mehta Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College
  • Arun Kumar Gupta Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Rural Medical College, Loni, Maharashtra (India)
  • Vishal Gupta Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College
  • Poonam Darswal Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College
  • Jyoti Khanna Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College
  • Ashok Chowdhary Dept. of Anesthesiology & Critical Care. Govt. Medical College
Keywords: Propofol, Midazolam, Co-induction, Laryngeal mask airway, Hemodynamics

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we compared the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique to propofol/midazolam for laryngeal mask insertion. We also studied the incidence of undesirable effects in relation to LMA insertion.

Methodology: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial study, 60 adults belonging to ASA class 1 and 2 were randomly divided in three groups; Group1- Saline-propofol; Group 2- Propofol-midazolam; Group 3- Propofol-propofol. The induction characteristics reviewing various parameters like the induction dose required, hemodynamic changes and the cost of induction were observed. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at 2, 4 and 6 minutes post induction.

Published
02-05-2019
How to Cite
Wali, D., Mehta, A., Gupta, A. K., Gupta, V., Darswal, P., Khanna, J., & Chowdhary, A. (2019). A prospective, randomized, controlled trial study of comparison of two techniques for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 93-98. Retrieved from https://apicareonline.com/index.php/APIC/article/view/541
Section
Original Articles