A prospective randomized study to compare levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm orthopedic surgery

  • Payal Jain Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Razi Shahid Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Mukesh Kumar Prasad Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Md Alauddin Alam Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Macha Niranjan Reddy Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Gurdeep Singh Jheetay Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Keywords: Brachial plexus block, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, ultrasound guidance

Abstract

Background: Brachial plexus block utilizing ultrasound imaging has now become either adjuvant to general anesthesia (GA) or as a mainstay anesthesia modality. There are fewer studies comparing the effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. This prospective randomized study compared 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine in patients undergoing forearm orthopedic surgeries under Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.

Methodology: A total of 56 patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups of 28 patient each. Group R was given 30ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine and Group L was given 30 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine in supraclavicular block under ultrasound guidance. Parameters assessed were onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and any adverse events. After administration of block, the block characteristics were assessed every 5 min till onset of complete blockade, then hourly till the effect of block. Data between the groups were analyzed using with SPSS 25.0 software.

Results: The study shows that there was statistically significant difference in onset of sensory and motor block between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine (7.54 min 2.10 vs 8.55 min 2.08) and (12.95 min 2.30 vs 14.07 min 2.22) respectively. The duration of analgesia was more in Levobupivacaine group (9.98 hours 4.88) as compared to Ropivacaine (8.03 hours 3.58).

Conclusion: The onset of action of sensory and motor was early with Levobupivacaine and can be a better choice when postoperative analgesia is prime concern. However, where faster recovery of motor function is required Ropivacaine is preferred choice.

Key words: Brachial plexus block, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, ultrasound guidance

Citation: Shahid R, Prasad MK, Alam MA, Jain P, Reddy MN, Jheetay GS. A prospective randomized study to compare levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm orthopedic surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(5): 613–619; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i5.1629

 

Published
09-30-2021
How to Cite
Jain, P., Shahid, R., Prasad, M., Alam, M. A., Reddy, M., & Jheetay, G. (2021). A prospective randomized study to compare levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm orthopedic surgery. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 25(5), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i5.1629
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH